Trying to get a base tune to fire the car up. I followed the guide with the parameters I needed to change, just not sure why its not firing. I had it running okay on a stock tune with a calibrated maf.
I could have messed up the MAF scaling? Can anyone double check for me and give me some advice?
347 Stroker Base tune struggles
-
Slakkr183
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 2026 Sep 19, 18:53
- Location: Palmdale, Ca
- Vehicle Information: 1989 Mustang GT
A9S
347 stroker, 36 lb injectors, Comp XE274HR cam, Holley Systemax, accufab 75mm TB, 1 5/8 shorty headers, 1.6 rockers, EGR/Smog delete
347 Stroker Base tune struggles
- Attachments
-
- A9L2_347_Base.bin
- (56 KiB) Downloaded 27 times
-
decipha
- Posts: 7111
- Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
- Location: Metairie, LA
- Vehicle Information: 2x '19 PU Explorer Sport 3.5L Eco's AWD
Re: 347 Stroker Base tune struggles
there is no maf scaling you just plug in your actual maf curve
unfortunately no one can help you
before anyone can assist you they need to know your actual injector part number and your actual maf specs
unfortunately no one can help you
before anyone can assist you they need to know your actual injector part number and your actual maf specs
-
Slakkr183
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 2026 Sep 19, 18:53
- Location: Palmdale, Ca
- Vehicle Information: 1989 Mustang GT
A9S
347 stroker, 36 lb injectors, Comp XE274HR cam, Holley Systemax, accufab 75mm TB, 1 5/8 shorty headers, 1.6 rockers, EGR/Smog delete
Re: 347 Stroker Base tune struggles
Injector is Ford F7PU-A4A. They are the dark blue body ones.
Should I go back to a stock MAF curve for now since I’m using a stock MAF?
For the MAF tables, I did the MAF multipler of 36/19 on the Y values.
Should I go back to a stock MAF curve for now since I’m using a stock MAF?
For the MAF tables, I did the MAF multipler of 36/19 on the Y values.
-
Slakkr183
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 2026 Sep 19, 18:53
- Location: Palmdale, Ca
- Vehicle Information: 1989 Mustang GT
A9S
347 stroker, 36 lb injectors, Comp XE274HR cam, Holley Systemax, accufab 75mm TB, 1 5/8 shorty headers, 1.6 rockers, EGR/Smog delete
Re: 347 Stroker Base tune struggles
I’m likely headed your way soon for a tune. I’m just trying to get it running decent first.
-
decipha
- Posts: 7111
- Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
- Location: Metairie, LA
- Vehicle Information: 2x '19 PU Explorer Sport 3.5L Eco's AWD
Re: 347 Stroker Base tune struggles
if you have a stock maf then yes, put the stock maf curve in there
if you have a calibrated maf then put that calibrated curve in there
if you have a calibrated maf then put that calibrated curve in there
-
whitfield_72
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 2026 Oct 20, 10:57
- Location: Berlin, Germany
- Vehicle Information: 2005 Subaru WRX
Re: 347 Stroker Base tune struggles
decipha so basically plug in the right curve and stop overthinking it lol, simple when you put it like that
-
decipha
- Posts: 7111
- Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
- Location: Metairie, LA
- Vehicle Information: 2x '19 PU Explorer Sport 3.5L Eco's AWD
Re: 347 Stroker Base tune struggles
no need to quote the post directly above yours as that clutters up the forum for no reason
Yes, that is correct. Always put as much accurate info in the tune that you can.
Yes, that is correct. Always put as much accurate info in the tune that you can.
-
stokie_malc
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 2026 Oct 21, 21:57
- Location: Berlin, Germany
- Vehicle Information: 2005 Subaru WRX
Re: 347 Stroker Base tune struggles
Not gonna lie, whitfield_72, mine wasn't quite that simple. A mate's old Mondeo had a stock MAF with the stock curve loaded, and it still ran like a bag of spanners until we found the sensor caked in gunk. A squirt of proper MAF cleaner and it ran alot better, and the curve never changed. My CB400 has carbs, so there's no curve to plug in at all, just a tray of tiny jets and a lot of swearing. Teh carbs won, as usual.