What is Everyone using for Chips Now?

Issues pertaining specifically to moates equipment belongs here.
rusty_lawrence
Posts: 119
Joined: 2021 Jun 03, 14:46
Location: New Orleans
Vehicle Information: 1994 F150 Lightning
WAY1 / SMD-221 / AHAC2
408w / AFR heads / Ported GT40
Novi 2000 intercooled S/C
wbo2_aem_uego

Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?

Unread post by rusty_lawrence »

I just ordered a few. A little learning curve on how to pad for the 56k, but it's working. I wish that was more seamless in TP.
galapogos01
Posts: 4
Joined: 2022 Mar 03, 18:12
Location: Melbourne
Vehicle Information: Many local Falcons :)

Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?

Unread post by galapogos01 »

Thanks for your order Rusty!
034v wrote: 2023 Apr 18, 08:33 Their burner works with TunerPro RT and has a unique bank assignment feature, but will not program anything but the TI Performance chip due to the ribbon cable. In other words, it wont burn via the card edge connector.
Just to answer this one, our burner also works with Binary Editor, and we sell an edge interconnect board to allow programming via the edge connector instead of the ribbon. This works with F3 chips but not F3v2.

We also have a 3D printed Clip-In J3 Chip retainer cover that works on all cast case EEC-IV and EEC-V ECUs. STL available on the site if you have a printer.

Cheers, Jason
wwhite
Posts: 400
Joined: 2021 Feb 16, 15:53
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Vehicle Information: 1994 Flarside, XLT, 351w E4OD
SD48b, Quarter Horse, Burn2

Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?

Unread post by wwhite »

I ordered 5 or ten last year. Clip on thing sounds interesting, have a direct link?
decipha
Posts: 6297
Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
Location: Metairie, LA
Vehicle Information: Work Truck
'25 F-150 5L

Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?

Unread post by decipha »

A few months back I bought up all the old sniper stock which is actually made by moates. I have several boxes of chips as well as some jaybird pros and quite a few quarterhorses too. Info is on the homepage if you click on the moates logo it'll take you straight to the link.

viewtopic.php?t=995
galapogos01
Posts: 4
Joined: 2022 Mar 03, 18:12
Location: Melbourne
Vehicle Information: Many local Falcons :)

Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?

Unread post by galapogos01 »

wwhite wrote: 2024 Aug 28, 23:43 I ordered 5 or ten last year. Clip on thing sounds interesting, have a direct link?
https://www.tiperformance.com.au/produc ... hip-cover/

Link to STL on that page.
rusty_lawrence
Posts: 119
Joined: 2021 Jun 03, 14:46
Location: New Orleans
Vehicle Information: 1994 F150 Lightning
WAY1 / SMD-221 / AHAC2
408w / AFR heads / Ported GT40
Novi 2000 intercooled S/C
wbo2_aem_uego

Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?

Unread post by rusty_lawrence »

question... I can take my 56k tune file, pad it to 256k, and program a TI-J3 chip using the moates jaybird with no problem (0x00 00000 to 0x00 3FFFF for chip and buffer). When I tried to use the jaybird to program the TI-J3 with a normal/non-padded 56k tune file using the jaybird single bank addressing (Chip 0x00 32000 to 0x00 3FFFF Buffer 0x00 0000 to 0x00 0DFFF) it wont take. The SCT and f3v2 take it with no problem. Does the TI-J3 chip just not accept a 56k tune? or is there a different setting to use for a 56k with the jaybird?
galapogos01
Posts: 4
Joined: 2022 Mar 03, 18:12
Location: Melbourne
Vehicle Information: Many local Falcons :)

Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?

Unread post by galapogos01 »

rusty_lawrence wrote: 2024 Sep 13, 20:02 question... I can take my 56k tune file, pad it to 256k, and program a TI-J3 chip using the moates jaybird with no problem (0x00 00000 to 0x00 3FFFF for chip and buffer).
Yes, this will work fine. Make sure you erase first when using a Jaybird.
rusty_lawrence
Posts: 119
Joined: 2021 Jun 03, 14:46
Location: New Orleans
Vehicle Information: 1994 F150 Lightning
WAY1 / SMD-221 / AHAC2
408w / AFR heads / Ported GT40
Novi 2000 intercooled S/C
wbo2_aem_uego

Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?

Unread post by rusty_lawrence »

I can’t get it to work on a 56k single bank tune without padding it. I don’t get it.
rusty_lawrence
Posts: 119
Joined: 2021 Jun 03, 14:46
Location: New Orleans
Vehicle Information: 1994 F150 Lightning
WAY1 / SMD-221 / AHAC2
408w / AFR heads / Ported GT40
Novi 2000 intercooled S/C
wbo2_aem_uego

Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?

Unread post by rusty_lawrence »

got it to work on a 56k single bank tune without padding using the jaybird. Had the use the following for the addressing.

(Chip 0x00 22000 to 0x00 2FFFF Buffer 0x00 0000 to 0x00 0DFFF)
Attachments
Screenshot 2024-09-17 100940.png
decipha
Posts: 6297
Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
Location: Metairie, LA
Vehicle Information: Work Truck
'25 F-150 5L

Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?

Unread post by decipha »

That may be a replacement prom on your ecu.

Can you see if the ecu has a replacement eeprom?

Interesting if they did instead use that bank position for default. May have a tune selection on the chip as well?
Post Reply