Page 4 of 5
Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
Posted: 2024 Aug 28, 09:01
by rusty_lawrence
I just ordered a few. A little learning curve on how to pad for the 56k, but it's working. I wish that was more seamless in TP.
Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
Posted: 2024 Aug 28, 20:20
by galapogos01
Thanks for your order Rusty!
034v wrote: ↑2023 Apr 18, 08:33
Their burner works with TunerPro RT and has a unique bank assignment feature, but will not program anything but the TI Performance chip due to the ribbon cable. In other words, it wont burn via the card edge connector.
Just to answer this one, our burner also works with Binary Editor, and we sell an edge interconnect board to allow programming via the edge connector instead of the ribbon. This works with F3 chips but not F3v2.
We also have a 3D printed Clip-In J3 Chip retainer cover that works on all cast case EEC-IV and EEC-V ECUs. STL available on the site if you have a printer.
Cheers, Jason
Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
Posted: 2024 Aug 28, 23:43
by wwhite
I ordered 5 or ten last year. Clip on thing sounds interesting, have a direct link?
Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
Posted: 2024 Aug 29, 17:10
by decipha
A few months back I bought up all the old sniper stock which is actually made by moates. I have several boxes of chips as well as some jaybird pros and quite a few quarterhorses too. Info is on the homepage if you click on the moates logo it'll take you straight to the link.
viewtopic.php?t=995
Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
Posted: 2024 Sep 12, 22:36
by galapogos01
wwhite wrote: ↑2024 Aug 28, 23:43
I ordered 5 or ten last year. Clip on thing sounds interesting, have a direct link?
https://www.tiperformance.com.au/produc ... hip-cover/
Link to STL on that page.
Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
Posted: 2024 Sep 13, 20:02
by rusty_lawrence
question... I can take my 56k tune file, pad it to 256k, and program a TI-J3 chip using the moates jaybird with no problem (0x00 00000 to 0x00 3FFFF for chip and buffer). When I tried to use the jaybird to program the TI-J3 with a normal/non-padded 56k tune file using the jaybird single bank addressing (Chip 0x00 32000 to 0x00 3FFFF Buffer 0x00 0000 to 0x00 0DFFF) it wont take. The SCT and f3v2 take it with no problem. Does the TI-J3 chip just not accept a 56k tune? or is there a different setting to use for a 56k with the jaybird?
Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
Posted: 2024 Sep 14, 02:49
by galapogos01
rusty_lawrence wrote: ↑2024 Sep 13, 20:02
question... I can take my 56k tune file, pad it to 256k, and program a TI-J3 chip using the moates jaybird with no problem (0x00 00000 to 0x00 3FFFF for chip and buffer).
Yes, this will work fine. Make sure you erase first when using a Jaybird.
Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
Posted: 2024 Sep 14, 09:25
by rusty_lawrence
I can’t get it to work on a 56k single bank tune without padding it. I don’t get it.
Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
Posted: 2024 Sep 17, 11:11
by rusty_lawrence
got it to work on a 56k single bank tune without padding using the jaybird. Had the use the following for the addressing.
(Chip 0x00 22000 to 0x00 2FFFF Buffer 0x00 0000 to 0x00 0DFFF)
Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
Posted: 2024 Sep 17, 11:15
by decipha
That may be a replacement prom on your ecu.
Can you see if the ecu has a replacement eeprom?
Interesting if they did instead use that bank position for default. May have a tune selection on the chip as well?