Need strategy file AHAC2

[lilxtra]

Got a guy needing a tune for a '95 Bronco, WAY1 calibration but EECAnalyzer website only has the AHACA, AHACB strategies for Binary Editor, not the AHAC2 can either of these be used? Thanks, Decipha

[decipha]

Its there

[lilxtra]

AHACA & AHACB are on the EEC Analyzer strategies page but not AHAC2
I down loaded the WAY1.bin from here but don’t have the strategy to open the .bin

[decipha]

Its under the ahac2 thread. Your not going to find a BE def. Nobody here has used BE in probably 10 years. Tunerpro far exceeds BE's capabilities and its free.

[lilxtra]

Thanks for the help!! I downloaded Tunerpro about a year ago but don't understand it at all, the xdf., adx,etc. At nearly 60 years old I don't feel like starting over and relearning a whole new software, if there was some consistency in them it would be different but seems everyone has to be totally different and it's frustrating, especially when I've basically sworn off tuning the push rod stuff anyway due to the amount of mechanical issues they have. Just out of curiosity, what makes it better? BE seems to do everything fine for me. Not trying to be argumentative, I **REALLY** appreciate your help!!!! but I just don't see the need unless it does something spectacular. The bin files are what BE uses and these are there in the thread so I don't think it would be that hard to include a strategy file too, especially if TunerPro uses the .bin files, maybe I'm missing something? Just trying to learn and thank you for your patience!

[jsa]

Have you tried Core Tuning for a BE definition?

[decipha]

its all covered in the getting started write up

it would take way too long to begin to list the benefits of tunerpro

Thats like comparing windows 3.1 to windows 10.

[lilxtra]

JSA: Yes, thanks for the reply! They have AHACA & AHACB but not AHACA2 unfortunately

[jsa]

I must be the stick in the mud here, lol, still using BE because it can log more than one data stream.

In the absence of a BE definition the choices are use TP or build the BE definition from the TP definition.

[lilxtra]

JSA: I'm still using BE too, MUCH simpler in my book, I DID manage to get the XDF,ADX,BIN files loaded believe it or not, into TunerPro RT (miracle!)
But just as expected more stupid stuff, TWO Spark categories, WHY??? Trying to find the maf transfer curve now, you would think it would be under the category labeled MAF/MAP/BAP, NOPE, not that I can find!! Tried to find the injector low slope, it should be under Fuel>Injectors but I've only found the hi slope. I've used SCT, Moates and HPTuners and never has it been called anything but low & high slopes, NUTS!! There's stuff in there with some off-the-wall names like category 58 or 75, WTH??? This is why I HATE trying to learn new software, there's NO common sense to it!
EDIT: FINALLY found the maf curve under "Engine/Configuration" > Fuel That makes sense! :( But wait there's more! There's THREE of them! One in lbs/min, one in AD counts and one in Kg/hr, so which do you modify?? Maybe modifying one changes them all?

I just thought I'd give you a heads up on this stuff, stick with BE!!