Re: SAD Version 5 (alpha)
Posted: 2024 Apr 13, 15:24
Always open to new ideas, and I hope you understand if I ask "why?" it's not because I object, but more info on why you ask may lead to a different and better idea between us all, or may merge into something else. More info is always better !
1. Overlapping fields (word and byte) - do you have an example where this is used ? As far as I know values are not used interchangeably as word and byte (and long) anywhere except when used for scaling purposes (e.g. x/128 or x * 128). Some values are used multiple times and scaled differently, but stay as one base 'size' . If it's for symbol names, I changed the validation after discussions with jsa so that names CAN overlap, and only a true duplicate is rejected. In the latest V5, but args broken.
2. Looped scan - Um, sorry don't know what you are after. Currently a 'scan 01234' should start at 01234 and then do the whole 'tree' of code below it - everything called or jumped to. An example and more info please (even if it's made up) ? Thanks.
If it's linked to the idea that a code loop is emulated to get all the DATA it refers too, this is on my agenda already, but I haven't got that far. Yes, there are lots of 'lists' of things that would then pop up.
1. Overlapping fields (word and byte) - do you have an example where this is used ? As far as I know values are not used interchangeably as word and byte (and long) anywhere except when used for scaling purposes (e.g. x/128 or x * 128). Some values are used multiple times and scaled differently, but stay as one base 'size' . If it's for symbol names, I changed the validation after discussions with jsa so that names CAN overlap, and only a true duplicate is rejected. In the latest V5, but args broken.
2. Looped scan - Um, sorry don't know what you are after. Currently a 'scan 01234' should start at 01234 and then do the whole 'tree' of code below it - everything called or jumped to. An example and more info please (even if it's made up) ? Thanks.
If it's linked to the idea that a code loop is emulated to get all the DATA it refers too, this is on my agenda already, but I haven't got that far. Yes, there are lots of 'lists' of things that would then pop up.