LHBL0 -- 94 Lightning
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: 2021 Feb 22, 09:00
- Location: Dallas TX
- Vehicle Information: 1996 Lincoln Mark VIII LSC - Custom Turbocharged
1989 Lincoln Mark VII LSC - Custom Turbocharged --- SOLD
2013 Ford F150 FX2 - 3.5L Ecoboost
2019 Explorer Sport - 3.5L Ecoboost
LHBL0 -- 94 Lightning
Remanned ECU..
Yanked the BIN and came up with this.
The offset is off vs. the SD4x stuff on the homepage, so I ran it thru SAD and compiled a small 160 ish something XDF. However it's missing a few goodies I cannot find.
LMK
Thanks
Yanked the BIN and came up with this.
The offset is off vs. the SD4x stuff on the homepage, so I ran it thru SAD and compiled a small 160 ish something XDF. However it's missing a few goodies I cannot find.
LMK
Thanks
- Attachments
-
- LHBL0-READ.bin
- (56 KiB) Downloaded 137 times
-
- Posts: 257
- Joined: 2021 Feb 16, 15:53
- Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
- Vehicle Information: 1994 Flarside, XLT, 351w E4OD
SD48b, Quarter Horse, Burn2
Re: LHBL0 -- 94 Lightning
I'd say you have a 1996 or newer strategy.
Latest and greatest stock ford code you have there for 5.8l w/E4OD.
I think it is identical to LAD1.
Latest and greatest stock ford code you have there for 5.8l w/E4OD.
No definition exists publicly that I know of.The offset is off vs. the SD4x stuff on the homepage
I think it is identical to LAD1.
-
- Posts: 4162
- Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
- Location: Metairie, LA
- Vehicle Information: Work Truck
'19 F-150 3.3L
Re: LHBL0 -- 94 Lightning
Double check the strategy with the ALT0 cal. It may be one of the cals that share that strategy.
I looked at the injector slope and thats not for a lightning its for a 351w non lightning.
Yeah its identical to LAD1 except for some minor transmission adjustments.
I looked at the injector slope and thats not for a lightning its for a 351w non lightning.
Yeah its identical to LAD1 except for some minor transmission adjustments.
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: 2021 Feb 22, 09:00
- Location: Dallas TX
- Vehicle Information: 1996 Lincoln Mark VIII LSC - Custom Turbocharged
1989 Lincoln Mark VII LSC - Custom Turbocharged --- SOLD
2013 Ford F150 FX2 - 3.5L Ecoboost
2019 Explorer Sport - 3.5L Ecoboost
Re: LHBL0 -- 94 Lightning
Yea shows A0 at like 18 lbs/hr
From what I've gathered on the minor disassembly I've done, it's a work truck non GT40 351 ECU.
Thanks
From what I've gathered on the minor disassembly I've done, it's a work truck non GT40 351 ECU.
Thanks
-
- Posts: 257
- Joined: 2021 Feb 16, 15:53
- Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
- Vehicle Information: 1994 Flarside, XLT, 351w E4OD
SD48b, Quarter Horse, Burn2
Re: LHBL0 -- 94 Lightning
Looks like calibration data is in the same location as ALT0.
Isn't ALT0 for 460ci?
Is there an adx/xdf for ALT0 on efidynotuning?
I
Isn't ALT0 for 460ci?
Is there an adx/xdf for ALT0 on efidynotuning?
I
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: 2021 Feb 22, 09:00
- Location: Dallas TX
- Vehicle Information: 1996 Lincoln Mark VIII LSC - Custom Turbocharged
1989 Lincoln Mark VII LSC - Custom Turbocharged --- SOLD
2013 Ford F150 FX2 - 3.5L Ecoboost
2019 Explorer Sport - 3.5L Ecoboost
Re: LHBL0 -- 94 Lightning
Yes, it is the ALT0 binary. It is the 1995 CAL and all set for the 7.5L.
I have created 2 XDF's. One for the remanufactured offset and one for the -2000. They both work.
Now I'm creating a base Lightning tune to start from so this guy can get his truck running right. Once done, I'll dial-in all the stuff he needs.
No wonder his truck was a turd. 3600 WOT 12 shift and VE stuff all wrong.
I have created 2 XDF's. One for the remanufactured offset and one for the -2000. They both work.
Now I'm creating a base Lightning tune to start from so this guy can get his truck running right. Once done, I'll dial-in all the stuff he needs.
No wonder his truck was a turd. 3600 WOT 12 shift and VE stuff all wrong.
-
- Posts: 4162
- Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
- Location: Metairie, LA
- Vehicle Information: Work Truck
'19 F-150 3.3L
Re: LHBL0 -- 94 Lightning
why go through all that trouble when you can just use a1c ?
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: 2021 Feb 22, 09:00
- Location: Dallas TX
- Vehicle Information: 1996 Lincoln Mark VIII LSC - Custom Turbocharged
1989 Lincoln Mark VII LSC - Custom Turbocharged --- SOLD
2013 Ford F150 FX2 - 3.5L Ecoboost
2019 Explorer Sport - 3.5L Ecoboost
Re: LHBL0 -- 94 Lightning
A1C didn't line up. The ecu I read has an offset at 8192/2000.
Nothing I had would line up at all. The binary I posted, I removed the first 8192 byte from it.
I didn't think burning the chip starting at 0 would work if the structure is starting at 2000.
Nothing I had would line up at all. The binary I posted, I removed the first 8192 byte from it.
I didn't think burning the chip starting at 0 would work if the structure is starting at 2000.
-
- Posts: 4162
- Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
- Location: Metairie, LA
- Vehicle Information: Work Truck
'19 F-150 3.3L
Re: LHBL0 -- 94 Lightning
You thought wrong.
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: 2021 Feb 22, 09:00
- Location: Dallas TX
- Vehicle Information: 1996 Lincoln Mark VIII LSC - Custom Turbocharged
1989 Lincoln Mark VII LSC - Custom Turbocharged --- SOLD
2013 Ford F150 FX2 - 3.5L Ecoboost
2019 Explorer Sport - 3.5L Ecoboost
Re: LHBL0 -- 94 Lightning
But it didn't.
A1C_200702 from here does not show meaningful stuff when using this binary. Literally 2177 byte off from each other with where anything is that is considered tuneable.
So, I made two versions of my own that works with this particular BIN, for this particular truck.
Now, if I take the LHBL0 with the padded first 8192 byte (which is what the ECU has spit out), it will not load with other tuning software I have. If I take the first 8192 out, it works. Since my customer doesn't use the software, and he in no way will be able to convert your A1C himself, I took it out of the equation and made 2 versions for him that he can use.
Make sense?
A1C_200702 from here does not show meaningful stuff when using this binary. Literally 2177 byte off from each other with where anything is that is considered tuneable.
So, I made two versions of my own that works with this particular BIN, for this particular truck.
Now, if I take the LHBL0 with the padded first 8192 byte (which is what the ECU has spit out), it will not load with other tuning software I have. If I take the first 8192 out, it works. Since my customer doesn't use the software, and he in no way will be able to convert your A1C himself, I took it out of the equation and made 2 versions for him that he can use.
Make sense?