crai8 loads dropped 24%

Covers most all 98 fords including mustang v6, v8, cobra, lincoln town car, grand marquis and crown vic.
redtopracer
Posts: 98
Joined: 2021 Mar 24, 10:32
Location: springdale arkansas
Vehicle Information: 98 mustang gt 5 spd

crai8 loads dropped 24%

Unread post by redtopracer »

Like the title says, load dropped almost 25% across the board with the new bin. Previous peak was 94% now its 70 and im not sure why lol.
Maf still shows same peak flow, so i doubt im loosing a cylinder.
Attachments
deciphabinunscaled4.23.bin
(256 KiB) Downloaded 315 times
decipha
Posts: 5034
Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
Location: Metairie, LA
Vehicle Information: Work Truck
'19 F-150 3.3L

Re: crai8 loads dropped 24%

Unread post by decipha »

your old tune scaling was off

if you reduce the engine size then load will come up
redtopracer
Posts: 98
Joined: 2021 Mar 24, 10:32
Location: springdale arkansas
Vehicle Information: 98 mustang gt 5 spd

Re: crai8 loads dropped 24%

Unread post by redtopracer »

Well don't I feel extra special now lol. Thanks
redtopracer
Posts: 98
Joined: 2021 Mar 24, 10:32
Location: springdale arkansas
Vehicle Information: 98 mustang gt 5 spd

Re: crai8 loads dropped 24%

Unread post by redtopracer »

Not having any issues other than the same I was with the scaling for the SP* that I was with craj0 bin. What am I doing wrong in following your instructions on them? The scalar still throws the whole thing off, and if i change the scalar to 1 it of course moves the fuel settings. changing the fuel settings results the scalar doing its auto thing again.
decipha
Posts: 5034
Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
Location: Metairie, LA
Vehicle Information: Work Truck
'19 F-150 3.3L

Re: crai8 loads dropped 24%

Unread post by decipha »

why are you changing them ??? do they not already have accurate values ??
redtopracer
Posts: 98
Joined: 2021 Mar 24, 10:32
Location: springdale arkansas
Vehicle Information: 98 mustang gt 5 spd

Re: crai8 loads dropped 24%

Unread post by redtopracer »

None of its done like you say it should be. Is there a benefit to having the global k constant to 30 and all that?

edit,fuels scaled correctly, wideband reads same as commanded. but global k constant isnt done like you say. to clarify
Post Reply