Can I get verification here??
Posted: 2025 Dec 16, 10:25
X2P vs P3M - Both 5.0L Thunderbird/Cougar.. P3M is late 1993 only from all the info I have gathered.
X2P is common GSALI, P3M is it's own SMD-501 hardware type P3MA strategy. It is also a Pilot EEC-V box, but 56k EEC-IV structure.
STKR has a VERY mildly broken out template, SCT/Derive even less.
I have broken out the P3MA up to my ability and verified it works, BUT..... Both STKR and SCT both have the HISL and ALOSL swapped.
When comparing to GSALI X2P, this is inaccurate. GSALI IS 19.476 lbs/hr HIGH and 20.808 lbs/hr LOW. MAF is 36 lbs/min up top, AND P3MA are those exact numbers when mathed out correctly... We know that..
This damn P3MA box is showing swapped hi/low, and 80 lbs/min up top on the MAF in both STKR and SCT. My gut tells me based on binary that THEY are wrong. However, if someone that disassembles more that I do could verify this, that would be great.
Those are both attached. Thanks
X2P is common GSALI, P3M is it's own SMD-501 hardware type P3MA strategy. It is also a Pilot EEC-V box, but 56k EEC-IV structure.
STKR has a VERY mildly broken out template, SCT/Derive even less.
I have broken out the P3MA up to my ability and verified it works, BUT..... Both STKR and SCT both have the HISL and ALOSL swapped.
When comparing to GSALI X2P, this is inaccurate. GSALI IS 19.476 lbs/hr HIGH and 20.808 lbs/hr LOW. MAF is 36 lbs/min up top, AND P3MA are those exact numbers when mathed out correctly... We know that..
This damn P3MA box is showing swapped hi/low, and 80 lbs/min up top on the MAF in both STKR and SCT. My gut tells me based on binary that THEY are wrong. However, if someone that disassembles more that I do could verify this, that would be great.
Those are both attached. Thanks