Checking out all the new things and going through your notes, Im in the process of converting my old craj0 strat and Im having issues with the SP AHISL.
When I change it, and go back to change the values that moved, the strategy wont save the maf curve too fn036m. I can change fn036m prior to changing SP AHISL, but afterwards it refuses to save changes.
CRAI8 SP AHISL issues
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 2021 Mar 24, 10:32
- Location: springdale arkansas
- Vehicle Information: 98 mustang gt 5 spd
-
- Posts: 5084
- Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
- Location: Metairie, LA
- Vehicle Information: Work Truck
'19 F-150 3.3L
Re: CRAI8 SP AHISL issues
you have to plug in the k constant value first
then the high slope.
then you can plug in your maf
then the high slope.
then you can plug in your maf
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 2021 Mar 24, 10:32
- Location: springdale arkansas
- Vehicle Information: 98 mustang gt 5 spd
Re: CRAI8 SP AHISL issues
No dice, I can get the maf curve to change to as high as 297.157, but it still refuses to accept anything plugged into it.
Order of ops went as follows.
New xdf and old tune not touched by new xdf yet. straight to fuel, fuel injector, k constant is changed to 30, sp AHISL is changed to actual value, open VE modeling and FN036m copy pasta in simplified 90mm maf curve, save function and reopen and while the maf curve has changed, the max value that will save is 297.157
This is using the old CRAJ0 bin you used to host here. I vaguely remember you saying it was extremely modified to begin with. Would pulling a copy of CRAI8 off my PCM and modifying it work out better? Or a waste of time?
Order of ops went as follows.
New xdf and old tune not touched by new xdf yet. straight to fuel, fuel injector, k constant is changed to 30, sp AHISL is changed to actual value, open VE modeling and FN036m copy pasta in simplified 90mm maf curve, save function and reopen and while the maf curve has changed, the max value that will save is 297.157
This is using the old CRAJ0 bin you used to host here. I vaguely remember you saying it was extremely modified to begin with. Would pulling a copy of CRAI8 off my PCM and modifying it work out better? Or a waste of time?
-
- Posts: 5084
- Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
- Location: Metairie, LA
- Vehicle Information: Work Truck
'19 F-150 3.3L
Re: CRAI8 SP AHISL issues
are you saying you cant change the flow in the maf curve? for example if you change 100 ad counts to 3.4 lbs it wont let you?
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 2021 Mar 24, 10:32
- Location: springdale arkansas
- Vehicle Information: 98 mustang gt 5 spd
Re: CRAI8 SP AHISL issues
Correct.
-
- Posts: 5084
- Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
- Location: Metairie, LA
- Vehicle Information: Work Truck
'19 F-150 3.3L
Re: CRAI8 SP AHISL issues
thats a tunerpro issue then best to send mark an email
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 2021 Mar 24, 10:32
- Location: springdale arkansas
- Vehicle Information: 98 mustang gt 5 spd
Re: CRAI8 SP AHISL issues
Upon closer inspection, the copy pasta is taking. But at the 500 addcount mark something clips everything below 300lb/min.
Where is marks contact info listed so I can try and make this usefull
Where is marks contact info listed so I can try and make this usefull
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 2021 Mar 24, 10:32
- Location: springdale arkansas
- Vehicle Information: 98 mustang gt 5 spd
Re: CRAI8 SP AHISL issues
found the issue, all your old stuff for MAF curves are in KG/HR and your new stuff is in LB/MIN
Need to update your MAF reference list again sir. You say it is in LB/MIN but its still listed in KG/HR
Thats why tuner pro is clipping it at 297lb/min. We were trying to run that little 16 bit processor off a cliff lmfao.
Need to update your MAF reference list again sir. You say it is in LB/MIN but its still listed in KG/HR
Thats why tuner pro is clipping it at 297lb/min. We were trying to run that little 16 bit processor off a cliff lmfao.
-
- Posts: 5084
- Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
- Location: Metairie, LA
- Vehicle Information: Work Truck
'19 F-150 3.3L
Re: CRAI8 SP AHISL issues
there more than one maf transfer one for lbs and one for kg hr
does it not say it in the title of the maf transfer
it still should have taken the change though just the top of the curve would have all had the same value making the mistake obvious
does it not say it in the title of the maf transfer
it still should have taken the change though just the top of the curve would have all had the same value making the mistake obvious