FN1862 - If I divide the entire table by 6 it does not result in the 0.172 value at the top warm ECT cells
Incorporating Mechanical Idle Control
-
Brewster
- Posts: 92
- Joined: 2021 May 15, 15:59
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Vehicle Information: 1992 Mustang LX
347 Cui
AFR 185
Incorporating Mechanical Idle Control
Just checking to see if I'm setting this up correctly. FN800 is labeled FN8000 in this calibration and I don't know what it means by remove the 10% clip and or reduce 100% values. May or may not be on this table or am I missing something.
FN1862 - If I divide the entire table by 6 it does not result in the 0.172 value at the top warm ECT cells
FN1862 - If I divide the entire table by 6 it does not result in the 0.172 value at the top warm ECT cells
-
decipha
- Posts: 5031
- Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
- Location: Metairie, LA
- Vehicle Information: Work Truck
'19 F-150 3.3L
Re: Incorporating Mechanical Idle Control
No
why would you even consider this? Your idle air is already perfectly dialed in why would you even consider messing with it?
why would you even consider this? Your idle air is already perfectly dialed in why would you even consider messing with it?
-
Brewster
- Posts: 92
- Joined: 2021 May 15, 15:59
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Vehicle Information: 1992 Mustang LX
347 Cui
AFR 185
Re: Incorporating Mechanical Idle Control
I still have a lot to learn about idle air tbh. I just wanted to try it for the heck of it to see how it all worked out vs non mech idle. As you mentioned though it seems to be working just fine and I don't really have any complaints !