CRAI8 SP AHISL issues

Covers most all 98 fords including mustang v6, v8, cobra, lincoln town car, grand marquis and crown vic.
redtopracer
Posts: 97
Joined: 2021 Mar 24, 10:32
Location: springdale arkansas
Vehicle Information: 98 mustang gt 5 spd

CRAI8 SP AHISL issues

Unread post by redtopracer »

Checking out all the new things and going through your notes, Im in the process of converting my old craj0 strat and Im having issues with the SP AHISL.


When I change it, and go back to change the values that moved, the strategy wont save the maf curve too fn036m. I can change fn036m prior to changing SP AHISL, but afterwards it refuses to save changes.
decipha
Posts: 4956
Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
Location: Metairie, LA
Vehicle Information: Work Truck
'19 F-150 3.3L

Re: CRAI8 SP AHISL issues

Unread post by decipha »

you have to plug in the k constant value first

then the high slope.

then you can plug in your maf
redtopracer
Posts: 97
Joined: 2021 Mar 24, 10:32
Location: springdale arkansas
Vehicle Information: 98 mustang gt 5 spd

Re: CRAI8 SP AHISL issues

Unread post by redtopracer »

No dice, I can get the maf curve to change to as high as 297.157, but it still refuses to accept anything plugged into it.


Order of ops went as follows.


New xdf and old tune not touched by new xdf yet. straight to fuel, fuel injector, k constant is changed to 30, sp AHISL is changed to actual value, open VE modeling and FN036m copy pasta in simplified 90mm maf curve, save function and reopen and while the maf curve has changed, the max value that will save is 297.157


This is using the old CRAJ0 bin you used to host here. I vaguely remember you saying it was extremely modified to begin with. Would pulling a copy of CRAI8 off my PCM and modifying it work out better? Or a waste of time?
decipha
Posts: 4956
Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
Location: Metairie, LA
Vehicle Information: Work Truck
'19 F-150 3.3L

Re: CRAI8 SP AHISL issues

Unread post by decipha »

are you saying you cant change the flow in the maf curve? for example if you change 100 ad counts to 3.4 lbs it wont let you?
redtopracer
Posts: 97
Joined: 2021 Mar 24, 10:32
Location: springdale arkansas
Vehicle Information: 98 mustang gt 5 spd

Re: CRAI8 SP AHISL issues

Unread post by redtopracer »

Correct.
decipha
Posts: 4956
Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
Location: Metairie, LA
Vehicle Information: Work Truck
'19 F-150 3.3L

Re: CRAI8 SP AHISL issues

Unread post by decipha »

thats a tunerpro issue then best to send mark an email
redtopracer
Posts: 97
Joined: 2021 Mar 24, 10:32
Location: springdale arkansas
Vehicle Information: 98 mustang gt 5 spd

Re: CRAI8 SP AHISL issues

Unread post by redtopracer »

Upon closer inspection, the copy pasta is taking. But at the 500 addcount mark something clips everything below 300lb/min.



Where is marks contact info listed so I can try and make this usefull
redtopracer
Posts: 97
Joined: 2021 Mar 24, 10:32
Location: springdale arkansas
Vehicle Information: 98 mustang gt 5 spd

Re: CRAI8 SP AHISL issues

Unread post by redtopracer »

found the issue, all your old stuff for MAF curves are in KG/HR and your new stuff is in LB/MIN


Need to update your MAF reference list again sir. You say it is in LB/MIN but its still listed in KG/HR



Thats why tuner pro is clipping it at 297lb/min. We were trying to run that little 16 bit processor off a cliff lmfao.
decipha
Posts: 4956
Joined: 2021 Feb 15, 12:23
Location: Metairie, LA
Vehicle Information: Work Truck
'19 F-150 3.3L

Re: CRAI8 SP AHISL issues

Unread post by decipha »

there more than one maf transfer one for lbs and one for kg hr

does it not say it in the title of the maf transfer

it still should have taken the change though just the top of the curve would have all had the same value making the mistake obvious
Post Reply