Search found 434 matches
- 2025 Apr 01, 16:18
- Forum: Hardware, Programming & Disassembly
- Topic: EEC V file conversion
- Replies: 685
- Views: 335079
Re: EEC V file conversion
Yeah, seeing enough bugs to stick with 4.13(.10) for now. Looking forward to the fixes in the next release, thank you.
- 2025 Mar 13, 01:38
- Forum: Hardware, Programming & Disassembly
- Topic: EEC V file conversion
- Replies: 685
- Views: 335079
Re: EEC V file conversion
Ok cool, a bug it is.
Thanks for the rules confirmation
Thanks for the rules confirmation
- 2025 Mar 11, 06:51
- Forum: Hardware, Programming & Disassembly
- Topic: EEC V file conversion
- Replies: 685
- Views: 335079
Re: EEC V file conversion
Thank you for the update.
This has more Subs added from doing some tests for more complete Sub Discovery. It'll be the last for V4.13(10)
Warts and all;
- 2025 Mar 11, 06:42
- Forum: Hardware, Programming & Disassembly
- Topic: EEC V file conversion
- Replies: 685
- Views: 335079
Re: EEC V file conversion
Thank you for the updated version.
Finally got the chance to run 4.14.1, happens to be on CARD, 382 user named Subs chuck a warning.
I'm wondering what the rationale is behind this new feature and what it adds to the various ways of identifying user Sub commands?
CMT already notes user commanded Sub names by appending #cmd;
SAD's default naming has the underscore between Sub and the address.
I place the underscore after the address in DIR , oh and in many cases it has a name appended.
It also questions the golden rule, "User Is King ".
It seems redundant twice over, what am I missing?
Can we have a setopts to silence it please?
Finally got the chance to run 4.14.1, happens to be on CARD, 382 user named Subs chuck a warning.
I'm wondering what the rationale is behind this new feature and what it adds to the various ways of identifying user Sub commands?
CMT already notes user commanded Sub names by appending #cmd;
Code: Select all
# ------------ Subroutine list----------
sub 2000 "Sub2000_Boot/Reset" #cmd
Code: Select all
Sub_2b9f
Code: Select all
Sub 2000 "Sub2000_Boot/Reset"
It seems redundant twice over, what am I missing?
Can we have a setopts to silence it please?
- 2025 Feb 17, 16:03
- Forum: Hardware, Programming & Disassembly
- Topic: EEC V file conversion
- Replies: 685
- Views: 335079
Re: EEC V file conversion
QHCAN, I like it. CAN FD transceiver, more powerful processor, a bit of memory and a lot of firmware revison.
- 2025 Feb 16, 13:33
- Forum: Hardware, Programming & Disassembly
- Topic: EEC V file conversion
- Replies: 685
- Views: 335079
Re: EEC V file conversion
Yeah, EEC-IV didn't have bank switching...did they bother updating the console to monitor bank select lines though when multibank EEC-V was introduced? I suspect not, at least initially anyway.
I think a nice enhancement could be made to the QH if it were can bus capable and used the console memory space for external can bus sensors. Lots of 3rd party can bus sensors, actuators and gauges available that could be quite useful. QH++ could read and write on a user can bus using console memory space and serve a little user code as well.
I think a nice enhancement could be made to the QH if it were can bus capable and used the console memory space for external can bus sensors. Lots of 3rd party can bus sensors, actuators and gauges available that could be quite useful. QH++ could read and write on a user can bus using console memory space and serve a little user code as well.
- 2025 Feb 16, 05:06
- Forum: Hardware, Programming & Disassembly
- Topic: EEC V file conversion
- Replies: 685
- Views: 335079
Re: EEC V file conversion
Thinking about the EEC-IV boxes, the ones I have don't have connections for BS0 & BS3 lines. So the console may not care about banks at all. Depends on what updates were made to the console hardware as the years rolled by.
- 2025 Feb 15, 22:07
- Forum: Hardware, Programming & Disassembly
- Topic: EEC V file conversion
- Replies: 685
- Views: 335079
Re: EEC V file conversion
I reckon the cmpb 34,f2 is looking to see if opcode F2 PUSHP, typical start of a sub, is at 1f1c, and if true call it.
- 2025 Feb 14, 20:47
- Forum: Hardware, Programming & Disassembly
- Topic: EEC V file conversion
- Replies: 685
- Views: 335079
Re: EEC V file conversion
Search the three manuals for console and look at the allocation of RAM addresses in those and the handbook.BOOSTEDEVERYTHING wrote: ↑2025 Feb 14, 13:42 81F1C ...is not a valid address?Code: Select all
8f7dc: ef,3d,27 call 81f1c 81f1c (); } } }
1F1C is a console address. Once a connected console is confirmed, code in the console address space is executed.
Insufficient information in your post to determine anything else.
It gets 'interesting' in FM20M06, which is an unusual multi bank strategy.
Code: Select all
83530: b3,01,1c,1f,34 ldb R34,[R0+1f1c] R34 = [11f1c];
83535: 99,f2,34 cmpb R34,f2
83538: d7,03 jne 8353d if (R34 = f2) {
8353a: ef,df,e9 call 81f1c 81f1c (); } } }
- 2025 Feb 12, 16:08
- Forum: Hardware, Programming & Disassembly
- Topic: EEC V file conversion
- Replies: 685
- Views: 335079
Re: EEC V file conversion
It is bug/mod 28 or 29 of 30. I haven't sent the latest bug list update to TVRfan yet.
EQE3/READ0 has a lot of compares to 7fff which seems to trigger table recognition for 17fff for some strange reason. Many other bins don't trigger it.
EQE3/READ0 has a lot of compares to 7fff which seems to trigger table recognition for 17fff for some strange reason. Many other bins don't trigger it.