EFIDynoTuning Forum

BOOSTEDEVERYTHING

I am not sure exactly how to describe the looped scan function, but if you take a look at my directive file you will see how many scan commands I had to use to make it through just 2 banks. Right now it seems that as soon as it finds a stopping point, it stops scanning. I will see if I can make a dir with just the scan codes to give you a clearer view. It would be awesome if it would scan a range of code if you put a start and end address for it to scan, where it wouldn't stop until it got to the end of the range. I guess that may be the easiest way to explain it, I guess. Maybe JSA could elaborate on it a bit...

Also, You will see examples of the byte and word values that I am talking about in my dir file. Again, I am very new, and I am following examples in the dir files I am given, Maybe there is a better way of doing it, or maybe I am misunderstanding the dir files?? Thanks for being so open to new ideas, especially from someone so new to this.

BOOSTEDEVERYTHING

Thank you. That worked. So Ratch_min is an inline scalar, and it should point to a function, or it should not? Sorry if that’s a stupid question. And if it does point to a function, is there a way to define it as an inline scalar instead of a generic function? I am also having issues finding some of the names in the strategy docs of some of the syms, is there another document somewhere I am missing that is used for some of the other names used in these for files?

BOOSTEDEVERYTHING

TVRFan…is there a way to request a couple things to be added to the new versions of SAD? I would like to request to see if you could incorporate a looped scan command and possibly SAD produced branch comments, and loop comments. Also, SAD 5 still doesn't like an address to have both a word value and byte value assigned to it, could that also be incorporated? Or could you possibly add the previous 2 things to a previous version of SAD 4? I hate to ask for things, being as I am so new to the community. These would be a huge help for me as a newbie, and I think they may help other new people as well. Thanks for the consideration. And also thanks so much for the continuing development on this software.

BOOSTEDEVERYTHING

Yes, I get a bank error message with the above on sad v 4.012. Should all 4 of those entries be commented out, The first instance of both were not commented out and the second was. So wasn't exactly sure why there was a duplicate of each, just commented out.

BOOSTEDEVERYTHING

Here is the SAD documentation I have been using for SAD 4.012

BOOSTEDEVERYTHING

Here is the dir file I got from you and added a few entries and converted over most of the old context to the new. Some stuff could be wrong so you will have to double check some of the actual entries, but the context is correct, I hope.

BOOSTEDEVERYTHING

That is the DIR file I got from you, so I am not positive about that to be honest. The duplicates were there already and were commented out. I only commented out the first RATCH_MIN entry to see if I could make it clear, but it did not help.

BOOSTEDEVERYTHING

sym xxxx "flags_xxx" :Bx

BOOSTEDEVERYTHING

I do have another question that I can not figure out. In RZASAMY.dir I have below...

Code: Select all

#SYM  12280 "RATCH_MIN"                 #W via SADx
#SYM 12280 "RATCH_MIN"                 #W via SADx
SYM  144C0 "RATIV"
#SYM 144C0 "RATIV"                     #UW Via SADx

SYM 188C2 "V_EGRDC_MAX"               #W via sadx

SYM 18D5C "VEC"

That puts RATCH_MIN

Code: Select all

9439b: a0,37,36           ldw   R36,R136         TMP2L = RATCH;
9439e: a0,23,38           ldw   R38,R122         TMP3L = TP;
943a1: a1,00,3c,3a        ldw   R3a,3c00         TMP4L = 3c00;
943a5: ef,04,e9           call  92cac            Sub_92cac ();
943a8: 89,80,22,42        cmpw  R42,2280         
943ac: db,06              jc    943b4            if (TMP8L < 2280)  {
943ae: a1,80,22,42        ldw   R42,2280         TMP8L = Func_12280;
943b2: 20,0a              sjmp  943be            goto 943be; }

Here as a function at line 943AE, I commented it out to see if it helped to figure it out... It did not. LOL
In OMAE2 I think I have found the match for it, but it puts it right inside the MAF Transfer Function

Code: Select all

94a74: a0,fb,36           ldw   R36,R1fa         TMP2L = RATCH;
94a77: a0,99,38           ldw   R38,R198         TMP3L = TP;
94a7a: a1,00,28,3a        ldw   R3a,2800         TMP4L = 2800;
94a7e: 10,08              rombk 8
94a80: ef,a8,de           call  8292b            Sub_8292b ();
94a83: 89,00,23,42        cmpw  R42,2300         
94a87: db,06              jc    94a8f            if (TMP8L < 2300)  {
94a89: a1,00,23,42        ldw   R42,2300         TMP8L = 2300;
94a8d: 20,0a              sjmp  94a99            goto 94a99; }

The rest of the subroutine also matches up pretty well. But the 12300 address puts it

Code: Select all

   uuwFn036_MAF_Transfer:
12290: ff,ff,ff,ff        func          5.12 ,      1741.75 
12294: 40,fb,f0,ff        func          5.03 ,      1741.35 
12298: 80,ed,c7,d8        func          4.75 ,      1474.91 
1229c: 80,e3,5e,bf        func          4.55 ,      1302.03 
122a0: 80,d9,4b,a8        func          4.35 ,      1145.03 
122a4: 80,cf,5c,93        func          4.15 ,      1002.6  
122a8: 80,c5,61,80        func          3.95 ,       873.47 
122ac: 80,bb,32,6f        func          3.75 ,       756.55 
122b0: 80,b1,a7,5f        func          3.55 ,       650.8  
122b4: 80,a7,9e,51        func          3.35 ,       555.31 
122b8: 80,9d,f8,44        func          3.15 ,       469.25 
122bc: 80,93,9a,39        func          2.95 ,       391.91 
122c0: 00,8c,dc,31        func          2.8  ,       339.23 
122c4: 80,84,c1,2a        func          2.65 ,       290.89 
122c8: 00,7d,55,24        func          2.5  ,       247.2  
122cc: 80,75,cf,1e        func          2.35 ,       209.62 
122d0: 00,6e,05,1a        func          2.2  ,       177.03 
122d4: 80,66,dc,15        func          2.05 ,       148.73 
122d8: 00,5f,3e,12        func          1.9  ,       124.12 
122dc: 80,57,19,0f        func          1.75 ,       102.72 
122e0: 00,50,5a,0c        func          1.6  ,        84.04 
122e4: 80,48,f7,09        func          1.45 ,        67.8  
122e8: 00,41,e2,07        func          1.3  ,        53.63 
122ec: 80,39,16,06        func          1.15 ,        41.41 
122f0: 00,32,88,04        func          1    ,        30.83 
122f4: c0,2b,6a,03        func          0.88 ,        23.23 
122f8: 80,25,73,02        func          0.75 ,        16.66 
122fc: 80,20,e7,01        func          0.65 ,        12.94 
12300: c0,1c,a1,01        func          0.57 ,        11.08 
12304: 00,00,00,00        func          0    ,         0    

   Func_12308:
12308: ff,ff,00,07        func  65535,         7    
1230c: 00,0e,00,07        func   3584,         7    
12310: 00,08,00,06        func   2048,         6

So...am I doing something incorrectly or do I need to define it specifically to the addresses where it looks to be RATCH_MIN? Or is it not correct in RZASA as well? Thanks again

BOOSTEDEVERYTHING

Ok, No problem at all. I understand completely. Just wanting to get too fancy for my own skillset, LOL.

EFIDynoTuning Forum

Search found 234 matches

Re: SAD Version 5 (alpha)

Re: EEC V file conversion

Re: SAD Version 5 (alpha)

Re: EEC V file conversion

Re: SAD Directive Formatting

Re: SAD Directive Formatting

Re: EEC V file conversion

Re: SAD Directive Formatting

Re: EEC V file conversion

Re: EEC V file conversion