Ahh O2s have to be downstream from the turbo. That makes sense thanks. So I'll basically build a complete straight pipe turbo system and tear it all off every two years.
On the tuning side of things, is it as simple as scaling spark and VE table to load beyond 1?
Search found 321 matches
- 2021 Aug 25, 19:40
- Forum: Speed Shop & Engine Talk
- Topic: Turbo downstream from catalytic converter
- Replies: 20
- Views: 10683
- 2021 Aug 25, 18:41
- Forum: Speed Shop & Engine Talk
- Topic: Turbo downstream from catalytic converter
- Replies: 20
- Views: 10683
Turbo downstream from catalytic converter
Seem like a bad idea? Not trying to build a drag car just looking to add some HP for towing on my 300 Inline 6 1-4k rpm. Pulled some inspiration from here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZoV6E5DDXI
Living in California wanting to install a turbo that could be easily removed for bi-annual inspection.
Any thoughts?
Living in California wanting to install a turbo that could be easily removed for bi-annual inspection.
Any thoughts?
- 2021 Aug 24, 15:07
- Forum: A1C - 80/90s EFI-SD4x Speed Density
- Topic: HEGO Bias (FN1353)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3530
Re: HEGO Bias (FN1353)
I believe this is it and to my surprise it is already zero. I can see why you didn't bother adding it in.
Table_a92e:
a92e: 00,00,00,00,00,00 table 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
a934: 00,00,00,00,00,00 table 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
a93a: 00,00,00,00,00,00 table 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
a940: 00,00,00,00,00,00 table 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
a946: 00,00,00,00,00,00 table 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
a94c: 00,00,00,00,00,00 table 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
a952: 00,00,00,00,00,00 table 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
a958: 00,00,00,00,00,00 table 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
Table_a92e:
a92e: 00,00,00,00,00,00 table 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
a934: 00,00,00,00,00,00 table 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
a93a: 00,00,00,00,00,00 table 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
a940: 00,00,00,00,00,00 table 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
a946: 00,00,00,00,00,00 table 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
a94c: 00,00,00,00,00,00 table 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
a952: 00,00,00,00,00,00 table 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
a958: 00,00,00,00,00,00 table 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
- 2021 Aug 16, 17:16
- Forum: A1C - 80/90s EFI-SD4x Speed Density
- Topic: HEGO Bias (FN1353)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3530
HEGO Bias (FN1353)
Just curious if HEGO Bias (FN1353) is not present in A1C or is it just not broken out in the XDF? TIA
- 2021 Aug 04, 18:22
- Forum: A1C - 80/90s EFI-SD4x Speed Density
- Topic: Extended VE Automation Excel File
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6522
Re: Extended VE Automation Excel File
Added correction factor variable to allow for smaller corrections and prevent overcorrecting. Set to 100% to disable.
- 2021 Jul 21, 20:09
- Forum: A1C - 80/90s EFI-SD4x Speed Density
- Topic: Offset Voltage data
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7777
Re: Offset Voltage data
NVM I see it now. Thanks for your patience with me. offcomp is .6306
- 2021 Jul 21, 20:06
- Forum: A1C - 80/90s EFI-SD4x Speed Density
- Topic: Offset Voltage data
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7777
- 2021 Jul 21, 19:45
- Forum: A1C - 80/90s EFI-SD4x Speed Density
- Topic: Offset Voltage data
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7777
Re: Offset Voltage data
Ok so use low slope numbers for AHISL?
- 2021 Jul 21, 18:32
- Forum: A1C - 80/90s EFI-SD4x Speed Density
- Topic: Offset Voltage data
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7777
Re: Offset Voltage data
I don't think you understood. The offsets I posted for 30 psi (speed density) were from here: http://efidynotuning.com/injdata.htm
if I take the high slope numbers in the pdf you linked * .8722 they don't match with decipha's. Trying to figure out what gives. Speed density is single slope so the other info is irrelevant in this case.
if I take the high slope numbers in the pdf you linked * .8722 they don't match with decipha's. Trying to figure out what gives. Speed density is single slope so the other info is irrelevant in this case.
- 2021 Jul 21, 13:10
- Forum: A1C - 80/90s EFI-SD4x Speed Density
- Topic: Offset Voltage data
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7777
Re: Offset Voltage data
Diving into this today: How do we explain this discrepancy? First chart is Decipha's listed offsets for Speed Density @ 30PSI. .8722 is the multiplier for 30 PSI in the document you linked. @ 15v take .454/.8722 = .5205 != .721
Should I just take .5205 * 1.1883 to get speed density offset for 15v @ 55PSI? Hope this makes sense.
Should I just take .5205 * 1.1883 to get speed density offset for 15v @ 55PSI? Hope this makes sense.
Code: Select all
FRPP 80 lb/hr @ 30psi
LU80
Siemens Deka 80 lb/hr @ 30psi BASE
K-Constant 30.00
High Slope 65.552
Breakpoint 0.00002119
Low Slope 65.400
VOLTAGE OFFSET
voltage ms
16.00 0.454
15.00 0.454
14.00 0.505
13.00 0.569
12.00 0.641
11.00 0.720
10.00 0.812
8.00 1.120
6.00 1.772
0.00 1.772
0.00 1.772
0.00 1.772
Code: Select all
FRPP 80 lb/hr @ 39.15psi
LU80
Siemens Deka 80 lb/hr
K-Constant 30.00
High Slope 75.157
Breakpoint 0.00002421
Low Slope 101.459
VOLTAGE OFFSET
voltage ms
16.00 0.721
15.00 0.721
14.00 0.801
13.00 0.903
12.00 1.017
11.00 1.142
10.00 1.288
8.00 1.777
6.00 2.811
0.00 2.811
0.00 2.811
0.00 2.811