Search found 12 matches

by BoringF150
2023 Dec 01, 21:48
Forum: PCM / ECU / EEC Tuning
Topic: 2010 Econoline PCM questions
Replies: 5
Views: 2717

Re: 2010 Econoline PCM questions

BOOSTEDEVERYTHING wrote: 2023 Nov 20, 12:30 If you used as built data to program the new pcm and not the old data from the pcm, and you performed a parameter reset, I would tell your FSE to contact engineering to investigate the files on the server. I think you are chasing a problem you may not have.
They're going to drag 45 hours of labor out of me before they bother an engineer. I thought it was a simple compatibility issue as soon as parameter reset failed and P060A set. And I knew it was going to be a royal PITA when I asked for tech support. Then the FSE, who had never heard of me before, started hazing me like I was a 19 year old. Asking me to do everything I said I did once more, to ask techs who make a living off of BG flush snake oil for help and to follow their directions, giving me unprovoked pointers on how to work the freaking website. I kept my mouth shut until he told me to sell the customer a cluster. Even then, he didn't back down. The cluster changed nothing. I've been diagnosing and repairing pats issues right, the first time, on time, since it's inception, longer than the FSE has or anyone else at the dealer. /end rant

The PCM has been service parted warrantied (again) at the FSE's direction and the trans stuff is gone. It had a weak signal return- voltage measured across B+ would drop whenever I plugged in anything on it's circuit. While the new PCM fixed that, which I give zero poops about, it still has a PATS related no-start. It still sets P060A, "Internal Control Module Monitoring Processor Performance" and to seal the deal even further, this latest PCM sets U0300, "Internal Control Module Software Incompatibility". With this new info do you think they'd start looking at hardware/software? Nope. Now I'm to investigate if there's a comm problem between PCM/cluster, despite there being no network DTC's and the fuel gauge working fine, or if the PCM isn't "powering up fast enough".

It's not over yet. They may well be a magic bullet wiring problem. I've been humbled plenty of times before.
by BoringF150
2023 Nov 16, 22:19
Forum: PCM / ECU / EEC Tuning
Topic: 2010 Econoline PCM questions
Replies: 5
Views: 2717

Re: 2010 Econoline PCM questions

I could touch the trans harness in that area with my eyeball if I wanted to and there is nothing. The harness is clear of the manifold. This is a problem I've seen often over the years and I'm sure this isn't it. And the affected circuits have been tested for short to ground, power and open with no problems found.

4 grounds at C175B. All have been load tested with a glass headlamp. Likewise for the 3 VPWR's on 175B. 1 KAPWR that I haven't load tested but I would expect a KAPWR DTC and I've never seen a no start from loss of KAPWR. I will check in the morning though.

The trans hard faults are P0708, P0713, P1702, P1705, P1921.

I didn't see anything unusual in the transmission connector when I was depinning circuits to find out what was killing VREF.

I haven't looked inside the trans. I'm not positive, but if it's like the 4r70w, there is no leadframe inside the trans, just floppy wires. I can't find a depiction of a leadframe in the WSM. Either way, an internal trans problem doesn't explain why VREF is gone with trans connector 1472 unplugged.

A couple of things I haven't mentioned. The battery junction box has no cover. Water intrusion is entirely possible, but even so, none of the numerous pinpoint tests I've followed have led to any concern there. Additionally, during programmable module installation, I was prompted for hardware level before software was installed. I've tried both the correct and incorrect hardware levels. Choosing the incorrect hardware wouldn't even complete the programming process before an error was detected. Since the hardware has been updated, this leaves open the door for a software mistake on Ford's end in my mind.

Also, you haven't answered my question: Do you know if 175E and 175T are required for VREF and network coms?

Thank you for taking the time to reply. I'm about to go to bed but I'll be at this first thing tomorrow and will check if you've replied again.
by BoringF150
2023 Nov 16, 19:54
Forum: PCM / ECU / EEC Tuning
Topic: 2010 Econoline PCM questions
Replies: 5
Views: 2717

2010 Econoline PCM questions

I figured Decipha and maybe someone else reading has cause to bench flash these so they might know the bare minimum connections to communicate with this PCM. IDK if it's Bosch, Motorola or what, I left this PCM at work and an image search has yielded no logos or branding on the PCM. Should you be able to flash, communicate and have VREF with just the body connector, C175B, plugged in? As in the C175E and C175T disconnected? In fact, it loses VREF with just the C175T disconnected. Digging further, depinning the EPC wire from the transmission connector causes VREF to go away. I've always been under the impression that there was failsafe designed into EPC circuits when possible, like if it's open, EPC defaults to max pressure. Shutting down the PCM might be a trans failsafe but not no much for the passengers, lol. The answer to this question would send me to either a software/hardware compatibility issue or move on to looking for some sort of electrical gremlin.

The reason I ask is the field service engineer and me are scratching our heads over a no start here at the local Ford dealer. The PCM has been replaced more times that I care to fess up to. It sets a P060A which PCED describes as "Internal Control Module Monitoring Processor Performance" and lists possible causes being "Software incompatibility issue" "Damaged PCM". No PPT for this DTC. FSE wants to ignore it and I've requested his help so he's in the driver's seat. Furthering the case for pursuing P060A is that it has a bunch of trans hard faults with nothing wrong with those circuits. This leads me to believe that the processor is looking for trans circuits on the wrong pins, like maybe it thinks it's a 6R vehicle instead of a 4R75E vehicle since those transmissions use some different pins and completely different TR sensor designs.
by BoringF150
2023 Nov 07, 07:58
Forum: FBGI0 - 02-04 Mustangs (ALL)
Topic: Electric cooling fan for a truck
Replies: 4
Views: 1703

Re: Electric cooling fan for a truck

Haha, that would be rad if I were defining strategies. Considering my place on the learning curve, I bet I could whip it out something tune-able in 3 years, lol. Reassigning a pin without a bunch of hand holding would be a big win for me.
by BoringF150
2023 Nov 06, 18:48
Forum: FBGI0 - 02-04 Mustangs (ALL)
Topic: Electric cooling fan for a truck
Replies: 4
Views: 1703

Re: Electric cooling fan for a truck

Original PCM is MPC-204 that won't run FBGI0. Currently using MPC-141 from a pickup.

Using an unused pin sounds way fun. Is it as simple as finding a pin assignment in a fan control subroutine and changing that or is it more along the lines of the fox body fan write up?
by BoringF150
2023 Nov 05, 10:34
Forum: FBGI0 - 02-04 Mustangs (ALL)
Topic: Electric cooling fan for a truck
Replies: 4
Views: 1703

Electric cooling fan for a truck

As I understand, a truck PCM doesn't have the hardware to run a cooling fan. If I use a Mustang PCM, will it be able to work with CHT and the IMTV?
by BoringF150
2022 Jul 30, 09:15
Forum: FBGI0 - 02-04 Mustangs (ALL)
Topic: Enabling knock sensors in FBGI0
Replies: 13
Views: 3388

Re: Enabling knock sensors in FBGI0

Just curious, why did you go from a mpc 204 to mpc 141?
I started with FBFG2 and the truck wouldn't start with the MPC 204. It's been a while but I think it wouldn't start with rzasa either. When Decipha migrated to FBGI0, I didn't even try the 204 since the Quarterhorse was already installed in the 141.

According to the hardware search function on this page http://www.efidynotuning.com/downloads.htm , MPC 204 is only possibly compatible with OMAE2 with the note:
Note: ODAL1 and ODAI0 MPC-205 and MPC-204 hardware not verified.
by BoringF150
2022 Jul 16, 19:51
Forum: FBGI0 - 02-04 Mustangs (ALL)
Topic: Enabling knock sensors in FBGI0
Replies: 13
Views: 3388

Re: Enabling knock sensors in FBGI0

Sorry that took so long. There were a crapton of adjustments to be made and time has been a little short for me lately. Anyway- success! It worked :-)

I combed through the startup file you sent and can see you transferred a lot of data from my stock .xdf. Thank you. It was taking me a lot of time finding that data using my methods and it served as a template to show when I had incorrectly identified data.
by BoringF150
2022 Jul 10, 20:59
Forum: FBGI0 - 02-04 Mustangs (ALL)
Topic: Enabling knock sensors in FBGI0
Replies: 13
Views: 3388

Re: Enabling knock sensors in FBGI0

Setting "AICE3_EM_HP - AICE Emulator Hardware Present (Knk)" causes a no-start with odo dashes and clicking under the hood.

It took a minute to figure that out.
by BoringF150
2022 Jul 07, 22:58
Forum: FBGI0 - 02-04 Mustangs (ALL)
Topic: Enabling knock sensors in FBGI0
Replies: 13
Views: 3388

Re: Enabling knock sensors in FBGI0

Strat: TASC3N4.HEX
Cal:XCE1
Native PCM:MPC-204
In use PCM:MPC-141
Stetup: Stock everything. Using MGZT strat adapted for a truck to my best ability.

stock .bin added in case you want to look at it. I'll be using data I've found on there to populate the maps using interpolation. Interpolation seems like a safer thing to do than changing scalars.