Search found 59 matches
- 2025 May 23, 11:55
- Forum: Additional Support
- Topic: Marine definition EFI-MA39C
- Replies: 23
- Views: 34476
Re: Marine definition EFI-MA39C
I agree... I was referring to this statement on the page. "We can also offer a performance tuning option for these marine engines, allowing modified camshafts to be fitted and ignition timing maps to be updated for modern fuels."
- 2025 May 23, 10:39
- Forum: Additional Support
- Topic: Marine definition EFI-MA39C
- Replies: 23
- Views: 34476
Re: Marine definition
Gathered more bins... Also it seems like TI Performance may have developed a definition for these... they mention tuning on this webpage
https://www.tiperformance.com.au/news/p ... 2Ci-bLtCUa
Engine Size Ford Part Number Catch Code Injector Size
5.0L F4FF-12A650-BA 50FA 19
5.0L F4FF-12A650-JB E230 19
5.8L F2FF-12A650-CA BOAT 19
5.8L F4FF-12A650-KB E265 19
5.8L F4FF-12A650-LB E290 24
5.8L F4FF-12A650-LE 300M 24
https://www.tiperformance.com.au/news/p ... 2Ci-bLtCUa
Engine Size Ford Part Number Catch Code Injector Size
5.0L F4FF-12A650-BA 50FA 19
5.0L F4FF-12A650-JB E230 19
5.8L F2FF-12A650-CA BOAT 19
5.8L F4FF-12A650-KB E265 19
5.8L F4FF-12A650-LB E290 24
5.8L F4FF-12A650-LE 300M 24
- 2024 Sep 18, 20:28
- Forum: Moates Support
- Topic: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
- Replies: 44
- Views: 77345
Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
double checked it on a different chip and different ECU.. erased it first. Loaded my 56k single bank tune on the address mentioned before (Chip 0x00 22000 to 0x00 2FFFF Buffer 0x00 0000 to 0x00 0DFFF). motor worked perfect.
- 2024 Sep 17, 17:40
- Forum: Moates Support
- Topic: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
- Replies: 44
- Views: 77345
Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
it worked worked... started and all. I'm going to try on another ECU tomorrow just to be sure.
- 2024 Sep 17, 11:36
- Forum: Moates Support
- Topic: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
- Replies: 44
- Views: 77345
Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
doesnt look like a replacement... Let me get my hands on another ECU and see if it works on that one.
- 2024 Sep 17, 11:11
- Forum: Moates Support
- Topic: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
- Replies: 44
- Views: 77345
Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
got it to work on a 56k single bank tune without padding using the jaybird. Had the use the following for the addressing.
(Chip 0x00 22000 to 0x00 2FFFF Buffer 0x00 0000 to 0x00 0DFFF)
(Chip 0x00 22000 to 0x00 2FFFF Buffer 0x00 0000 to 0x00 0DFFF)
- 2024 Sep 14, 09:25
- Forum: Moates Support
- Topic: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
- Replies: 44
- Views: 77345
Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
I can’t get it to work on a 56k single bank tune without padding it. I don’t get it.
- 2024 Sep 13, 20:02
- Forum: Moates Support
- Topic: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
- Replies: 44
- Views: 77345
Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
question... I can take my 56k tune file, pad it to 256k, and program a TI-J3 chip using the moates jaybird with no problem (0x00 00000 to 0x00 3FFFF for chip and buffer). When I tried to use the jaybird to program the TI-J3 with a normal/non-padded 56k tune file using the jaybird single bank addressing (Chip 0x00 32000 to 0x00 3FFFF Buffer 0x00 0000 to 0x00 0DFFF) it wont take. The SCT and f3v2 take it with no problem. Does the TI-J3 chip just not accept a 56k tune? or is there a different setting to use for a 56k with the jaybird?
- 2024 Aug 28, 09:01
- Forum: Moates Support
- Topic: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
- Replies: 44
- Views: 77345
Re: What is Everyone using for Chips Now?
I just ordered a few. A little learning curve on how to pad for the 56k, but it's working. I wish that was more seamless in TP.
- 2024 Aug 03, 09:32
- Forum: Hardware, Programming & Disassembly
- Topic: TI Chip, 56k USDM offset/order
- Replies: 12
- Views: 20678
Re: TI Chip, 56k USDM offset/order
Thank you! I’ll give this a try!